SSI Age Redetermination for Disabled Children

Turning 18 is a major milestone for any young person, but for those receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI), it also triggers an important SSI age 18 redetermination for disabled children. This one-time review requires the Social Security Administration (SSA) to re-evaluate whether your child still qualifies for SSI under adult disability rules. Understanding what this review involves, what information SSA may request, and how work or income could affect benefits can help families prepare and advocate effectively during this transition.

What Happens When a Child on SSI Turns 18?

If your child has been getting Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits for a disability, there is an important change coming when they become 18 years old. The Social Security Administration (SSA) will take a fresh look at their case in what is called an “age-18 redetermination.”

This process helps SSA decide if your child still qualifies for SSI as an adult, based on adult rules for disability, which are different from the rules used for children. 

What is an Age-18 Redetermination?

When someone turns 18, SSA does not assume they are still eligible for SSI just because they were as a child. SSA conducts a special one-time review to decide if the person’s disability still qualifies under adult standards. This is not the same as a regular medical check-in called a Continuing Disability Review (CDR). It is only done once when the person turns 18 years old. 

What Will SSA Ask For?

SSA will ask for information about: 

  • Medical history 
  • Medications and treatments 
  • School experience 
  • Work history (if any) 
  • Financial situation

You do not have to send medical records yourself, but it helps to keep a list of your child’s doctors, visits, treatments, and medications. You can either share the records or give permission for SSA to get them. 

Can My Child Work and Still Get SSI?

If your child is already working or plans to work, earning money will not automatically stop their benefits during this review, but it can affect the outcome. 

For example, in 2025, adults who apply for SSI for the first time cannot earn more than $1,620 a month. However, during the age-18 review, SSA looks at more than just income. Still, the fact that your child is working successfully might make SSA think your child is not disabled enough to qualify. If SSA decides that your child is still disabled, earnings will lower the monthly SSI payment. 

What Usually Happens?

Around one-third of people lost their SSI benefits after this review. However, many others continue to receive support. The decision depends on your child’s unique situation and how strong the medical and other evidence is. 

Where Can I Get Help?

Project HEAL (Health, Education, Advocacy, and Law), part of Kennedy Krieger Institute, helps families navigate this process. They can answer your questions, explain your rights, and provide guidance about the process. You can visit their website for more information.  

Final Tip Rules can change, so be sure to check the official SSA website for the most up-to-date information at www.ssa.gov

Ableism and Parenting: The Air Our Children Breathe

Ableism and Parenting
Definition of Talila A. Lewis' definition of ableism: ableism is a system of assigning value to people's bodies and minds based on societally constructed ideas of normalcy, productivity, desirability, intelligence, excellence, and fitness. These constructed ideas are deeply rooted in eugenics, anti-blackness, misogyny, colonialism, imperialism, and capitalism. 
This systemic oppression leads to people and society determining people's value based on their culture, age, language, appearance, religion, birth, or living place, "health/wellness," and/or their ability to satisfactorily re/produce, "excel" and "behave." You do not have to be disabled to experience ableism. 
working definition by tall A. Lewis updated January 2022 developed in community with disabled Black/Indigenous radicalized people. More info: bit.ly/ableism2022

Ableism and parenting intersect in ways most people never consider—until children begin absorbing the quiet lessons our culture teaches about whose bodies are valued and whose are questioned. Simply put, ableism is the discrimination disabled people experience. However, I like Talila A. Lewis’  working definition the most. Talila is a multilingual abolitionist, artist, educator, writer, movement strategist, and community lawyer. 

Continue reading

Infographic: Trump v. United States Presidential Immunity

Presidential power and immunity shape how executive authority functions—and how accountability is enforced—in the United States. While the Constitution does not explicitly define presidential immunity, Supreme Court decisions such as Nixon v. Fitzgerald, Clinton v. Jones, and Trump v. United States have clarified (and in some cases expanded) the legal protections afforded to presidents for official acts. These rulings distinguish between civil and criminal liability and raise important questions about the limits of executive power, the balance of checks and balances, and what happens when presidential actions test constitutional boundaries. Understanding these distinctions is essential for anyone engaged in civic life, policy, or advocacy, as debates about immunity directly affect democracy, governance, and the rule of law.

Image of a red, white and blue infographic with a border of blue and red stars. Text reads: Presidential Power and Immunity
Presidential immunity protects the president of the United States from legal consequences for official acts performed while in office. Though not mentioned in the Constitution, courts have defined its scope. 
Civil vs. Criminal Immunity
Civil Immunity: In Nixon v. Fitzgerald and Clinton v. Jones, the Supreme Court found that presidents are immune from civil lawsuits for official actions but not for personal conduct related to their duties. 
Criminal Immunity: In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the president cannot be criminally prosecuted for official acts granted by the Constitution (e.g. pardons, military decisions) 
Why Does This Matter? 
1. Expands Presidential Power
The recent ruling in Trump v. United States expands presidential power by shielding official actions from criminal prosecution, raising concerns about accountability and checks on executive authority. 
2. Unclear Legal Authority 
With the expansion of presidential power- comes decisions that may not fall under the scope of what the president can typically do
3. Presidential Overreach
This raises questions about constitutional limits of presidential power when the president can make decisions about domestic law enforcement without a state governor's approval. 
How This Applies to Present Day
Recent events in Los Angeles, California have shown why presidential power and immunity matter. These events highlight the ongoing debate over how much power a president should have and whether they can be held accountable for how they use that power. 

The National Center for Dignity in Healthcare and Community Living for People with Disabilities.
www.ThinkEquitable.com

To learn more on this, check out Policy Unpacked 6 : Presidential Power and Immunity

Presidential Power and Immunity- Turquise/green background with several geometric shapes. Text reads: Policy Unpacked Policy Unpacked is a series of plain language articles about the policy process in the United States. We hope that it will serve as a roadmap for understanding how government policies come to life, how they evolve, and how people can engage with them. The National Center for Disability, Equity, and Intersectionality