Author: Guest Author

SSI Age Redetermination for Disabled Children

Posted on | by Guest Author | Leave a Comment on SSI Age Redetermination for Disabled Children

Turning 18 is a major milestone for any young person, but for those receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI), it also triggers an important SSI age 18 redetermination for disabled children. This one-time review requires the Social Security Administration (SSA) to re-evaluate whether your child still qualifies for SSI under adult disability rules. Understanding what this review involves, what information SSA may request, and how work or income could affect benefits can help families prepare and advocate effectively during this transition.

Continue reading →

Infographic: Trump v. United States Presidential Immunity

Posted on | by Guest Author | Leave a Comment on Infographic: Trump v. United States Presidential Immunity

By: Kendall Eaton, Esq.

Presidential power and immunity shape how executive authority functions—and how accountability is enforced—in the United States. While the Constitution does not explicitly define presidential immunity, Supreme Court decisions such as Nixon v. Fitzgerald, Clinton v. Jones, and Trump v. United States have clarified (and in some cases expanded) the legal protections afforded to presidents for official acts. These rulings distinguish between civil and criminal liability and raise important questions about the limits of executive power, the balance of checks and balances, and what happens when presidential actions test constitutional boundaries. Understanding these distinctions is essential for anyone engaged in civic life, policy, or advocacy, as debates about immunity directly affect democracy, governance, and the rule of law.

Image of a red, white and blue infographic with a border of blue and red stars. Text reads: Presidential Power and Immunity Presidential immunity protects the president of the United States from legal consequences for official acts performed while in office. Though not mentioned in the Constitution, courts have defined its scope. Civil vs. Criminal Immunity Civil Immunity: In Nixon v. Fitzgerald and Clinton v. Jones, the Supreme Court found that presidents are immune from civil lawsuits for official actions but not for personal conduct related to their duties. Criminal Immunity: In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the president cannot be criminally prosecuted for official acts granted by the Constitution (e.g. pardons, military decisions) Why Does This Matter? 1. Expands Presidential Power The recent ruling in Trump v. United States expands presidential power by shielding official actions from criminal prosecution, raising concerns about accountability and checks on executive authority. 2. Unclear Legal Authority With the expansion of presidential power- comes decisions that may not fall under the scope of what the president can typically do 3. Presidential Overreach This raises questions about constitutional limits of presidential power when the president can make decisions about domestic law enforcement without a state governor's approval. How This Applies to Present Day Recent events in Los Angeles, California have shown why presidential power and immunity matter. These events highlight the ongoing debate over how much power a president should have and whether they can be held accountable for how they use that power. The National Center for Dignity in Healthcare and Community Living for People with Disabilities. www.ThinkEquitable.com

To learn more on this, check out Policy Unpacked 6 : Presidential Power and Immunity

Presidential Power and Immunity- Turquise/green background with several geometric shapes. Text reads: Policy Unpacked Policy Unpacked is a series of plain language articles about the policy process in the United States. We hope that it will serve as a roadmap for understanding how government policies come to life, how they evolve, and how people can engage with them. The National Center for Disability, Equity, and Intersectionality

The First Amendment and Freedom of Speech

Posted on | by Guest Author | Leave a Comment on The First Amendment and Freedom of Speech

By Tracy Waller, MPH, Esq.

The First Amendment was written in 1789 and ratified (officially approved) on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. When the Constitution was written in 1787, it did not initially include a list of individual rights.

The First Amendment protects your right to think, speak, believe, and gather freely—the main freedoms that make self-government and open debate possible. There have been many lower court and Supreme Court cases that have explored the freedoms under the First Amendment, so it has been reviewed and refined many times since it was created.

Continue reading →