The Importance of Section 504

In the current State of Texas V. Becerra case, 17 states are challenging the legality of Section 504. On February 25, 2025, all 17 states and HHS were due to file a joint report. Once a briefing schedule has been posted, views from the disability community can be presented to the court. The National Center for Disability, Equity, and Intersectionality will issue more information as it becomes available. In the meantime, you can find more information from DREDF (Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund) here.

Continue reading

Law Spotlight: Acheson v. Laufer Infographic

In December 2023, The Supreme Court of the United States heard Acheson v. Laufer regarding whether ADA ‘testers’ can ensure public entities’ comply with disability and civil rights laws. To read more about this case, check out Disability Activists Closely Watch SCOTUS Case and ADA Supreme Court Case Update: Acheson v. Laufer.

Read more: Law Spotlight: Acheson v. Laufer Infographic
Blue infographic: Acheson v. Laufer
Image of a hotel. Text reads: About the Case: Deborah Laugher, a disabled woman filed a lawsuit against Acheson Hotels. In this lawsuit, Laufer said that the hotel website was not accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 
Image of the Supreme Court. Text reads: Issue of the case: whether testers can ensure public entitities comply with disability and civil rights laws and also have standing to Sui an establishment for violating the ADA, despite not intending to personally visit the establishment. 
Image of a group of people in different shades of pink. Text: What are Testers? Testers are individuals that judge the accessibility of a website or location to make sure it meets ADA regulations. Testers are preferred by many disability advocates due to time constraints. Image of gavel. text: SCOTUS Holding: In December 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled that the case was moot. Fiding a case moot means that the case no longer required a decision because a solution was found. Image of a judge with gavel in hand. Text: Meaning of Ruling: lower courts, not SCOTUS, will decide if people can be testers for the ADA or not. This means that some states and circuits may allow testers for the ADA, while others will not. 
Image of the scales of justice. text: affect of Ruling: the positive impact is that the SCOTUS decision did not change the ADA in any way. The negative impact is that it still leaves the question of whether we can have testers for compliance with the ADA or not. 
The National Center for Disability, Equity, and Intersectionality
www.Thinkequitable.com